<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The case for church membership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://afcmin.org/ateam/145/the-case-for-church-membership/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://afcmin.org/ateam/145/the-case-for-church-membership</link>
	<description>Helping plans come together, one post at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2015 14:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://afcmin.org/ateam/145/the-case-for-church-membership/comment-page-1#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://afcmin.org/ateam/?p=145#comment-484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Garrett, interesting post.  Church membership is not a popular idea in West L.A., but I think if more churches adopted it, there would be less of a problem with transience.  People continually wander from church to church here and don&#039;t develop any roots or deep relationships.  
I think of it being like marriage:  when people make a formal commitment to a church they are much less likely to leave on a whim, and more likely to learn to work out differences with others--developing character and having a greater long-term impact on their communities.  Church is like a family, and I don&#039;t think we do as well when we&#039;re just &quot;living together.&quot;
This isn&#039;t an argument from Scripture, but I thought I&#039;d throw it out there anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garrett, interesting post.  Church membership is not a popular idea in West L.A., but I think if more churches adopted it, there would be less of a problem with transience.  People continually wander from church to church here and don&#39;t develop any roots or deep relationships.<br />
I think of it being like marriage:  when people make a formal commitment to a church they are much less likely to leave on a whim, and more likely to learn to work out differences with others&#8211;developing character and having a greater long-term impact on their communities.  Church is like a family, and I don&#39;t think we do as well when we&#39;re just &#8220;living together.&#8221;<br />
This isn&#39;t an argument from Scripture, but I thought I&#39;d throw it out there anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
