<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christianity&#8217;s Central Theme?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://afcmin.org/ateam/788/christianitys-central-theme/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://afcmin.org/ateam/788/christianitys-central-theme</link>
	<description>Helping plans come together, one post at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2015 14:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://afcmin.org/ateam/788/christianitys-central-theme/comment-page-1#comment-3285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://afcmin.org/ateam/?p=788#comment-3285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two thoughts, not necessarily in contradiction to what is being said, just thoughts.
First on this: &quot;Once again, worship is a means to an end, and that end is to glorify God.&quot;
In practice, what would be the difference between &quot;bringing glory to God&quot; and &quot;worship&quot;.  If worship is much much more than singing songs, than it seems like these ideas would be synonymous.
And then, just as food for thought, those of us in the &quot;missional&quot; community, (missional being different than missions, more holistic theoretically) find the theological impetus for this in our understanding of our Trinitarian God.  An understanding neatly summed up in a phrase like: &quot;As the Father sent the Son, and together they sent the Spirit, so our God sends his church into the world.&quot; (if a bit simplistic)
(check out wikipedia&#039;s Missio Dei entry)
I think I would be more comfortable describing the purpose of the church as &quot;missions&quot; (or a missional life style), rather than that being the &quot;central theme&quot; of Christianity.  I say this because in some sense the church is temporary, when viewed in light of eternity.
I would tend to agree with piper when he points out that the absence of worship drives us. The father heart of God, a god who leaves the 99 for the one, the nature of our God as a sending God, this drives the church to place the missio dei as primary, and yes, because our God is a jealous God, one who desires an intimate relationship with his bride, the church.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two thoughts, not necessarily in contradiction to what is being said, just thoughts.<br />
First on this: &#8220;Once again, worship is a means to an end, and that end is to glorify God.&#8221;<br />
In practice, what would be the difference between &#8220;bringing glory to God&#8221; and &#8220;worship&#8221;.  If worship is much much more than singing songs, than it seems like these ideas would be synonymous.<br />
And then, just as food for thought, those of us in the &#8220;missional&#8221; community, (missional being different than missions, more holistic theoretically) find the theological impetus for this in our understanding of our Trinitarian God.  An understanding neatly summed up in a phrase like: &#8220;As the Father sent the Son, and together they sent the Spirit, so our God sends his church into the world.&#8221; (if a bit simplistic)<br />
(check out wikipedia&#39;s Missio Dei entry)<br />
I think I would be more comfortable describing the purpose of the church as &#8220;missions&#8221; (or a missional life style), rather than that being the &#8220;central theme&#8221; of Christianity.  I say this because in some sense the church is temporary, when viewed in light of eternity.<br />
I would tend to agree with piper when he points out that the absence of worship drives us. The father heart of God, a god who leaves the 99 for the one, the nature of our God as a sending God, this drives the church to place the missio dei as primary, and yes, because our God is a jealous God, one who desires an intimate relationship with his bride, the church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
