Maitreya and the Coming World Order
August 9, 2005 Posted by Roger Overton
Always make sure you’re near a television, or you just might miss him. Who? The Christ. Not Jesus the Christ, but Maitreya the Christ. I first heard about Maitreya in Warren Smith’s book, Deceived on Purpose. I as I stated in my review, Smith is incredibly knowledgeable about New Age spirituality and he tried to link Maitreya to Rick Warren (which he failed to do). Last Thursday I discovered Air America on my radio dial. This led to several hours of entertainment until I heard a rather creepy commercial. It was proclaiming the coming of Maitreya to the world; as well as his spokesman, Benjamin Crème, to Los Angeles on August 8th.
You can learn more about Mr. Crème and Maitreya at their website, Share International. The commercial made several claims that you can find on the site, such as Maitreya being the one who all the world religions have been waiting for. According to Mr. Crème, Maitreya has been on earth for almost 30 years and has appeared to many, performing miracles of healing. He has been proclaiming “sharing and justice”, which is why (I’m guessing) Mr. Crème was interviewed on an Air America program. This intrigued me, I’d never heard a false Christ lecture before; so Amy (Face), a couple of her friends, and I went to hear Mr. Crème this evening.
Before the lecture a man played many songs on his guitar featuring the words and teachings of Maitreya. The evening was billed by the emcee as one that “could be life changing” and referred to it as an outreach event. After Mr. Crème was introduced, he looked at every individual in the audience giving each a personal blessing. He said nothing, but while this occurred audio was played from messages of Maitreya as recorded by Mr. Crème through “mental overshadowing or telepathy.” During this time we were instructed to “meditate or hold a high thought.” This lasted ten-fifteen minutes. We were told by the recording (Maitreya’s words) that we would “find the qualities of Jesus in Maitreya” because Jesus was a Christ. However, Maitreya’s “method of manifestation is more simple… I am with you and in you.” We were called to make Maitreya part of ourselves and allow him to manifest through us and know God.
“I would point the way to the new direction which man, if he would survive, must take: First, men must see themselves as brothers… sons of the one father.” Poverty, according to Maitreya (through Crème), is a crime that fills him with shame. The solution involves saving people from starvation and needless death. This is to be accomplished by listening again to the “true voice of God within your hearts.” Maitreya can’t fulfill his plan on his own though, “I need your help. I call on you to aid me in my task.” We were told that the success of his mission depends on us. If we will succeed, we must know that we are gods. When the blessing ended I looked up (I’d diverted my eyes from Mr. Crème’s “blessing”) to see some people with arms raised forward, and many with their eyes closed.
After the blessing, Mr. Crème began his lecture. Frank Sontag, a radio host at 95.5 KLOS, introduced the lecture. It was well over two hours, even though it was only scheduled to be ninety minutes. According to Mr. Crème, New Age teachings have come from “evolved,” “perfected” men. Most of the early teaching can be found in Theosophical writings, such as those of Alice A. Baily. They have been proclaiming the end of the Age of Pisces and the dawning of the Age of Aquarius (queue the theme song). The New Age, according to Mr. Crème, is about looking forward in a fresh way in relation to the new alignment of the solar system according to the Zodiac. As the Age of Pisces declines, the energy that alignment gave us dissipates. As a result, all of the social structures built on the energy of Pisces will collapse and chaos and confusion will ensue if we fail to adapt to the new Age of Aquarius. It is at such times as this that war occurs, because “war is used by people who don’t know what to do.”
We are not at the end of the world, as many Christians would suggest. Rather, we are at the end of an Age. According to Mr. Crème, the world goes on for infinity, however, it will end when every grain of sand is perfected in its being. The Christ inaugurated the Age of Pisces through Jesus, and now he has returned in Maitreya to inaugurate Aquarius. Each age teaches us some necessary quality for our evolution. Pisces gave us the quality of individualism. We learned that human freedom and justice are “God given rights.” The United States likes the idea of freedom, but not equality. Justice is like what the Soviet Union did from 1913 until its collapse. It was an “experiment in justice.” It imposed equality on the physical plane through brotherhood (comrade).
Apparently Ronald Reagan was wrong- the Soviet Union was not evil, market driving forces are. They are “based on a scam” that “benefits the rich at the expense of the poor.” This evil has led to other evils, such as twenty-four countries owning nuclear weapons- particularly the United States and Israel. This will drive use to the edge of self-destruction. The way to get rid of terrorism is to get rid of greed, market-driven economies, and, especially, the G8.
Maitreya is the personal name of a man who is so pure and advanced he can “embody the Christ principle- love.” He is the head of other similarly evolved/perfect men who are the Masters of Wisdom. These men are here to advise the rest of us how we may evolve. Over the last 150 years our evolution has quickened, so Maitreya decided he could return. In 1945 he said he would return on the condition that some measure of peace would be restored, which means that sharing governs the world economy. However, in 1977 he decided to come whether we were ready for him or not. He took on a body that he had been creating for 7 or 8 years (no mother or father) and took up residence in the highest place of the Himalayas.
Incidentally, he wasn’t the first Master of Wisdom to come to us in our times. In 1975 five Masters entered the world, and shortly after two more followed. We were told only of one, named Jesus, who lives in Rome and is responsible for bringing together the Christian churches. Maitreya has “overshadowed” all of the religious teachers of the world- Jesus, Krishna, Buddha, etc., in order for us to be taught how to live- that “all of us are absolutely divine, not one more divine than another.” He has had many disciples, including President Roosevelt who instituted some of Maitreya’s plan in the formulation of the United Nations.
Maitreya is returning soon, maybe 2025 or 2050, Mr. Crème didn’t know for sure. He did know, though, that he’d be appearing on television. Also, if we fail to save the planet we would live in some dark corner of the universe in intense pain. To save the world, we must embrace “peace and justice.” This will be a good thing because human nature is to be happy and joyful.
My initial question, before anything had even started, was what the connection was between the New Age and socialism. I had no idea that almost the entire lecture would be an advertisement for socialism. Not just that, but also how corrupt and evil capitalism is. The New Age elements borrowed a lot from Buddhism- once we evolve and are perfected we can become a Master of Wisdom. Take out Maitreya and the Masters of Wisdom, and you wouldn’t find much difference between what Mr. Crème said and Brian McLaren’s teachings (which are also similar to Buddhism). Another interesting similarity- one of their brochures, “What Can I Do?”, lists several websites that are advancing Maitreya’s plan. You might have heard of some- www.moveon.org, www.one.org.
Some of the things Mr. Crème said were factually wrong; such as there being hundreds of thousands of civilian deaths caused by the Iraq war. Some things were so absurd I couldn’t help but chuckle or roll my eyes. However, I was constantly reminded that we were in a room full of some 200-250 people who believed every word of it. Here’s a Christ who doesn’t care about sin or true justice, but teaches that salvation is sharing food and health care. That’s not salvation. And evil is not capitalism, markets, or nukes. Evil is making ourselves to be God, which is precisely what Mr. Crème teaches. And these people buy it hook, line, and sinker. We overheard one man say afterwards that no matter how many times he hears Mr. Crème speak he always finds it interesting. I left heartbroken, wondering how many people would really be able to tell the difference between this anti-Christ and the Jesus Christ of the Bible.
Related posts:
- The Supremacy of Christ in the Postmodern World
- ETS 2007: Is the Spontaneous Market Order an Example of the Design without a Designer? By Jay W. Richards
- John Saw the Light of the World
- Pre-Order God and Governing Today!
- Valuing Apologetics in a Postmodern World
- O Holy Night (2)- Long Lay the World in Sin
Posted in 

content rss
August 9th, 2005 at 6:50 am
Roger,
Your post proves the truth that there is nothing new under the sun, even though this “Christ” supposedly overshadowed all other religions. Sounds like the same old pony show to me. Here is a person who likes money and has a political agenda (Socialism) and so plays on emotions by using common New Age religious teachings.
I'm with you – heartbroke that people fall for this garbage. How do we get through to folks with the truth of the only Christ, crucified and resurrected? Alas, my theology reminds me, “He has caused us to be born again” (I Peter 1).
August 9th, 2005 at 11:19 pm
It is bad form for to compare Mr. Cr
August 10th, 2005 at 1:57 am
I have to disagree. The question isn't whether it's appropriate to compare; the question is whether the comparison is accurate. Some of the content of Mr. Creme's lecture bears some striking resemblence to some of what McLaren has said. I'm not saying McLaren believes everything that Mr. Creme believes (or the Buddhist philosopher); I'm simply noting there are some similarities. I'm not sure how noting that is at all “bad form.”
August 10th, 2005 at 8:21 am
I agree with John. It may be accurate, to some degree (and that would seem to require a whole lot more argument), but it detracts from the overall purpose of your article, which was to shed light on what it was like to listen to a false Christ and his incredibly transparent political agenda.
It comes almost as an after-thought, and doesn't seem at all central to what you had been talking about.
You're right, imo, that the first question is whether the comparison is valid. Nothing follows without taking that question seriously. But that's not the only question. How, and if, and when, to make the comparison are also important questions.
August 10th, 2005 at 12:46 pm
Well I think it's obvious that it's not central to what I was talking about. I just don't see why it's “bad form” to make the comparison at all, especially when I believe it's a perfectly legitimate, and accurate, comparison.
How about if I put it this way, “As I sat listening to Mr. Creme, I couldn't help but note (which I literally did) that many of the things he said sounded similar to things said by Brian McLaren.”
August 10th, 2005 at 1:22 pm
To be fair, you did say that without the more outlandish references there was a great deal of similarity between the two with regard to their teachings.
I'm not a fan of McLaren. And, if I were it would be a concern to me if there were strong similarities between someone who I esteemed and a crackpot like Mr. Creme.
My point, and it is a minor one in relation to the entire post, is that bringing in McLaren trips a wire that turns the discussion into one about McLaren, because it will alienate those who do admire him.
I'm not saying such things shouldn't be said, but given the number of people in conversation with you who do admire McLaren, how one goes about being critical of him counts a great deal, just in terms of being heard. Bringing him up at the end of a post about a false Christ who is evangelizing an abominable gospel may not be the best way to be heard.
I imagine John and I reacted for different reasons. John because he does admire McLaren to some degree, and finds the comparison wrong. Me because I know that John and others admire McLaren, and suspect that the way McLaren has been introduced will close them off to listening to both your very worthwhile discussion of the evening, AND a potentianlly very interesting (though necessarily delicate and careful) comparison between McLaren and Creme's political and ethical teachings.
I'm not saying we should fear how others will take what we say, but I do think it should play into our presentational strategy.
(mainly I think it's a fascinating post that's now about McLaren, though ironically I've contributed to that, so I'll shush now).
July 27th, 2006 at 4:47 am
The Facts…. Benjamin Creme regularly lectures worldwide, and appears on television and radio
August 20th, 2006 at 11:22 am
It seems your mind was made up before you went to the lecture. You strike me as being cynical, arrogant, and naive. You say there were 200-250 people in the room who believed every word. How do you know that? Spare us your 'broken heart'. Waaah.
April 2nd, 2010 at 8:23 pm
[...] layer. It was “A Prayer for the New Age”–something Roger and I picked up during this fact-finding mission last [...]