The All-Consuming Self
September 15, 2007 Posted by Roger Overton
In the comments to a previous post, Aaron Snell referenced
the classical notion of freedom meaning “freedom to.” Ironically, I’ve been
reading Biblical Christian Ethics by David Clyde Jones and he discussed this as
well. Jones notes the shift from freedom being the ability to do what’s right,
to the current idea in our society that freedom is the ability to do what you
want…
“One of the most perceptive analyses of the American
character in the 1980s was the best-seller Habits of the Heart, by Robert
Bellah and four associates. The authors, backed up by their extensive
sociological research, observe that “Americans tend to think of the ultimate
goals of a good life as matters of personal choice.” Americans accordingly rank
freedom has practically become definitive of the good in the American mind. But
as Americans typically describe it, freedom is a summum bonum without positive content.
“Freedom turns out to mean being left alone by others, not
having other people’s values, ideas, or styles of life forced upon one, being
fee of arbitrary authority in work, family, and political life. What it is that
one might do with that freedom is much more difficult for Americans to define.”
(Bellah)
Freedom in the biblical tradition means freedom to do the
will of God; in the republican tradition, to participate in working for the
common good of society. But in modern American individualism, freedom means “freedom
of choice” without reference to objective moral criteria. “What does the Bill
of Rights mean to you?” a reporter asked a schoolchild viewing the original
manuscript on display. “Being free to do whatever you want,” was not the
expected reply. This is how the posterity of the founders of the American
republic typically construe the “blessings of liberty” it as the purpose of the
Constitution to secure for them/ “Choice is what this country’s all about” is a
proposition of bumper-sticker depth, yet it appears as the trump card in all sorts
of public policy issues… Freedom of choice functions in American culture as a
self-justifying moral absolute.” (pages 34-35).
In other
words, our culture’s view of morality, which went from generally objective to
subjective, has also affected our view of freedom. The postmodern culture puts
Self as the standard: Self is the standard for what is right, and it must be
unrestricted. In some sense, we are consuming ourselves. Our god is out
stomachs.
Related posts:
Posted in 

content rss
September 16th, 2007 at 1:28 pm
Jg 17:6 In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did that which was right in his own eyes.
Things don't change much in thousands of years.
September 17th, 2007 at 11:51 pm
Nice citation, Roger. It's funny when various things one reads all seem to start talking about the same thing - a serendipity of study, maybe:)
I concur thoroughly with Jones here, but I do have a question: you seem to link our self-absorbed, individualistic cultural mindset with postmodernism. What exactly do you see the connection as being? Is a postmodern culture necessarily self-absorbed? I ask because those we might call “postmodern” tend to make the claim that we evangelical Christians like to (overzealously and baselessly) lay the blame for most of our perceived cultural ills at the feet of postmodernism. It seems as if you are saying that the new view of freedom is a result of the change in our culture's view of morality. Is that where you see the seeds of this being sown? I'd be interested to see you flesh this thought out a bit.