Book Review: The Out of Bounds Church? By Steve Taylor

Date May 12, 2005 Posted by Roger Overton

What
do DJs, tourists, and postmodern philosophers have to do with church?
Apparently quite a bit. This recent book by Steve Taylor, a pastor in
New Zealand, is subtitled “Learning to Create a Community of Faith in a
Culture of Change.” Mr. Taylor draws from Karl Barth’s comment about
the task of preaching being to sit with the newspaper in one hand and
the Bible in the other. “I sit on the fault lines of a cultural shift.
In my right hand, I hold a video remote. In my left hand, I hold the
gospel of Jesus… Ours is the task of communicating the gospel in an age
of change.” (19)

 

The
book is in some sense a blueprint for how the church, or Christian
communities, can apply the gospel to the changing culture. Each chapter
is a postcard from an emerging church somewhere in the world. Each
postcard highlights some activity that reflects the goals of emerging
churches. Throughout the book there are also comments by different
people in the margins that expand, footnote, or softly critique what
Mr. Taylor writes.

 

Postcard
1 sets the stage for the rest of the book. In it, Mr. Taylor draws out
the differences between Frank Zeffarelli’s 1968 Romeo and Juliet and
Baz Luhrmann’s 1996 Romeo and Juliet. Each sought to translate
Shakespeare’s text into contemporary culture. The implication is that
the gospel has not changed, but the culture has, and in order to
communicate it effectively we need to re-translate it.

 

Mr.
Taylor offers different perspectives on how this can be done. One is to
view the church as continually being reborn. “If God is about
birthing—and rebirthing—and we are to be about the things of God, then
we, too, are called to acts that bring new life into the world.” (50)
“The belief in God’s constant re-creation drives much of the emerging
church. It is less a reaction against old forms and ideas and more a
response to God’s call for us to join in with the continuous birthing
of his kingdom.” (56)

 

Another
approach offered is tourist spirituality. “Tourism can serve as a
redemptive framework for postmodern mission, in which people are
‘tourists’ on spiritual journeys and the church operates as ‘tour
guide,’ stimulating forward movement and nourishing the quest.” (83)

 

Perhaps
the most interesting and telling perspective is that of cultural
sampling, applying the activities of DJs to the role of the church. For
Mr. Taylor this means playing television commercials, popular music,
showing art, reading poetry, reading scripture, and much more.

 

My
thoughts were generally mixed about this book. I think Steve Taylor
makes some good points about communicating the gospel in a global
culture that is almost entirely different than it was 10 years ago.

 

His
analysis of where the modern church is lacking is accurate in several
areas. One that I appreciated was that of the place of art in a worship
service. For some reason, we tend to consider the reading of scripture,
liturgies, and songs as the only legitimate forms of worship in
service. However, if God gave us abilities for creativity, it seems
those would be appropriate for the worship from Christ’s Bride as well.
Mr. Taylor also has some good theological points that should not be
missed, e.g. “Spiritual seekers can fall into the trap of picking and
choosing a feel-good theology that doesn’t have anything to do with the
truth of living life with God.” (82)

 

Contrary
to what many critics of the emerging churches have argued, the Bible
plays a role in Mr. Taylor’s view of church. In many of his theological
points he seeks to root his claims in the words of scripture. There
are, however, a few problems with how scripture is used. One is its
role in service, in which a few services that he describes
leave the Bible mitigated to either being one voice among
many voices (154) or having no role at all (55). Another problem is the
way Mr. Taylor exegetes scripture. The most prominent example is his
use of 1 Peter 3:1-7, which he uses to argue that Peter was “sampling
from culture and from the way of Jesus.” (141) Mr. Taylor assumes,
without argument, that some of Peter’s imperatives for how husbands and
wives relate are items from the culture, and this enables him to
dismiss several elements of what Peter says because “our world is not
Peter’s world” (143).

 

In contrast to Brian McLaren's A Generous Orthodoxy, this was a far
more interesting read and a far more accurate description of what's
going on in emerging churches. For anyone looking to find out what
emerging church is all about, this is the book to read. It exemplifies
the changes in methods for presenting the gospel that are happening,
however, it never clearly presents the gospel. Mr. Taylor tells us we
must remain orthodox and true to God, but what that means is wrapped up
in metaphors of birthing and incarnation that are unclear at points.
This is not a defense of emerging churches. However, it's mostly
accurate as a description of the emerging church.

Related posts:

  1. Book Review: The Emerging Church by Dan Kimball
  2. Book Review: Sex and the Supremacy of Christ ed by. John Piper and Justin Taylor
  3. Book Review: They Like Jesus but Not the Church by Dan Kimball
  4. Defining the Emerging/Emergent-Church/Movement/Conversation
  5. Modern Reformation #1- The Emerging Church by D.A. Carson
  6. ETS 4- John Hammett on the Emerging Church

6 Responses to “Book Review: The Out of Bounds Church? By Steve Taylor”

  1. Anonymous said:

    As a footnote, the author, Steve Taylor, blogs at http://www.emergentkiwi.org.nz and has a blog spefically for his book at http://www.outofboundschurch.org

  2. Anonymous said:

    I am not totally opposed to “art” in worship, but where do we draw the line? Does the line depend upon cultural considerations? And the age-old question: what about drama?
    Just want to hear your take Murdock.

  3. Anonymous said:

    Of course the review only scratches the surface. As I read the things taking place in EC regarding art in worship, much of it seemed like it would distract from God instead of point towards Him. What I'm suggesting is that we don't just write art and drama off as bad, but perhaps we engage more on a point by point basis. I think it's plausible that drama and dance were elements of the early church assemblies (I still haven't had time to read my 'worship in the early church' books), but I doubt they would have had dances that were the same that took place in pagan temples.
    In the book, DJ-ing is mentioned quite a bit. Personally, I prefer old hyms. But I can see where some people find it easier to worship to the style of a DJ. What matters whether it's music, art, drama, etc. is not so much the style, but the content, and in some cases the context in which it takes place.
    One example of where I think it the context is inappropriate appears on page 120. “I attended an alternative worship service in the UK on Trinity Sunday, 2001. Participants were asked to make friendship bracelets by weaving three threads together into a bracelet to remind them of the triune God. It was a superb example of takeaway spirituality, a pause in which participants might weave textures of the worship experience into their lives.” I'm quite clueless on how making a bracelet can “weave textures of the worship experience into their lives.” It seems to me that if we want to worship a triune God the best thing to do is to pursue Him with heart and mind, not make bracelets.
    Something John Mark Reynolds talks about that I agree with is encouraging the artists in our congregations. This doesn't mean we love everything they do. 98% of it will probably stink, and we should tell them as much so they can improve (is most Thomas Kinkade's stuff really that good?). Every once in awhile art will be produced that will inspire, enlighten, and capture our hearts in a way that points toward God. That seems very worthwhile to me.

  4. Anonymous said:

    aha . . you see . .. i told everyone it was a really good book
    steve and myself, apart from both being kiwis and both having bad hairstyles, both believe we must be missional before being emergent . . and if necessary . . . just missional.
    its a book that is worthwhile buying, and i dont say that often. it sits on my shelf and its a good one to give to people.
    thanks for your fair [agreeable] review

  5. Anonymous said:

    Andrew,
    I actually bumped it up in my reading list due to your recommendation, though I thought you'd have more comments in it.
    I'm still figuring out what exactly everyone's meaning when they say “missional,” but I did like the way Ryan Bolger presented it last Friday. I don't think I have a problem agreeing with you that we must at least be missional.
    Thanks for the comment

  6. Anonymous said:

    thanks. I have noted this review in my blog (http://www.outofboundschurch.org),
    and also responded to some of the comments you make. I appreciate the
    review and your generous comments and welcome the chance to dialogue if
    you have the time.
    steve
    http://www.emergentkiwi.org.nz

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.